descriptionTechnical Guidance — Halogen Systems Inc.

Your Chlorine Sensor
Is Lying to You —
Here's 65 Days of Proof

How a UK Water Utility Exposed Systematic Over-Dosing Caused by Membrane Sensor Fouling

A Field Evaluation at Compton Durville Water Treatment Works, Wessex Water. October 2025 – February 2026. 73 Operational Cycles | 65 Days of Continuous Data.

Key Findings: 65 Days of Membrane Fouling

+10.67%
Chlorine rise per cycle
Progressive membrane fouling
5-6%
Average over-dose
Actual vs. intended residual
0
Maintenance required
MP5 over 5 months
20%
Faster weekend fouling
Lack of weekday calibration

Executive Summary

The operators at Compton Durville thought their dosing was under control. Siemens Depolox showed residuals at setpoint. When Wessex Water installed an MP5 alongside, it revealed the actual residual was rising steadily — climbing approximately 10% per cycle.

Iron deposits fouled the Depolox membrane, causing progressive under-reading. The PID system responded by dosing more chlorine. Not a dramatic failure but slow, invisible drift. Weekday calibrations partially corrected it; weekends accumulated fouling 20% faster.

The MP5 required zero intervention for 5 months — providing a baseline of what actual residual control should look like in high-iron borehole water.

Site Background: Compton Durville WTW

Compton Durville Water Treatment Works operates with significant operational constraints and water quality challenges typical of deep borehole installations in the UK.

water

Borehole Water Quality

Elevated iron (Fe) concentration creates progressive fouling challenges for membrane-based sensors.

history

Sensor History

Previously tried Kuntze and ATi probes — both experienced similar fouling issues in high Fe/Mn waters.

sensor_door

Sensor Deployment

Depolox provides PID feedback control; MP5 was installed as independent monitor only.

schedule

Operational Cycle

System shuts down 09:00–15:00; operates 15:00–09:00 daily (16-hour cycle).

Evidence of Progressive Fouling

Over 65 days and 73 operational cycles, consistent data revealed a systematic pattern of membrane degradation and increasing over-dosing.

Cycle Rise Rate

+10.67%

Start of cycle: 0.6038 ppm → End: 0.6714 ppm

Accumulation Rate

0.53%/hour

Consistent iron deposit buildup

Average Over-Dose

5.3%

Mid-cycle residual vs. setpoint

Worst Day Performance

+13.95%

Sunday (no calibration)

Best Day Performance

+8.32%

Tuesday (post-calibration)

Day-of-Week Pattern: Calibration Effect

Fouling accumulation shows a clear weekly cycle. Weekday calibrations partially reset the fouling signal, while weekends show uninterrupted accumulation.

Day of WeekMean Rise (%)Notes
Sunday13.95%Highest accumulation
Monday10.82%Post-weekend fouling
Tuesday8.32%Post-calibration effect

Operator Calibration Effect

Weekday Accumulation: +0.0639 ppm average residual rise per cycle when operators perform daily calibrations.

Weekend Accumulation: +0.0767 ppm average residual rise per cycle without calibration intervention.

Net Weekday Effect: Nearly zero net change (operator calibrations correct fouling signal back to setpoint), but the underlying fouling continues undetected.

Critical Finding: Even daily calibration cannot keep pace with cumulative fouling. The membrane degradation is progressive and inevitable without physical cleaning.

Root Cause: Membrane Fouling in High-Iron Waters

The failure mechanism is well-understood but not adequately addressed in membrane sensor design for high-iron, high-manganese borehole waters.

warning

Iron Deposits on Membrane

Borehole water with elevated iron (Fe) creates diffusion barrier, progressively degrading sensor signal.

warning

Signal Degradation Feedback Loop

As sensor under-reads due to fouling, PID system increases dosing to reach setpoint — causing over-chlorination.

warning

History of Membrane Issues

Previous probes (Kuntze, ATi) had identical fouling problems in high Fe/Mn waters.

warning

Membrane Sensors Not Ideal for High Iron/Manganese

Diffusion membrane technology susceptible to particulate and mineral fouling in source water with elevated metals.

Conclusions

check_circle

MP5 Accuracy Over 5 Months

Zero maintenance required. Consistent, drift-free readings — the control baseline.

check_circle

Depolox Fouling Progression

Under-reading of 10.67% per cycle. Iron deposits create diffusion barrier with predictable accumulation rate.

check_circle

PID Over-Compensation

Control system increases dosing to reach setpoint, resulting in 5–6% average over-dosing of chlorine.

check_circle

Calibration Limitations

Daily calibration corrects the displayed reading but does not reverse underlying membrane fouling. Effects resume on every cycle.

check_circle

Widespread Problem

Kuntze and ATi probes showed identical fouling patterns in the same environment. Membrane sensor vulnerability is systemic.

Related Resources